The Wire

Real-time updates from ANZ tech sales

19 days ago
News

Cyber Wardens closes Friday, leaving 2.5m SMBs without free security training

## Program ends after two years Cyber Wardens, the government-backed cyber security training program for small businesses, closes Friday September 11. COSBOA has been running the platform since late 2023 with $23.4 million in federal funding. Government support concluded July 31, 2026. No extension was approved. The program targeted 2.3 million to 2.5 million Australian small businesses, aiming to train 50,000 cyber wardens over three years. COSBOA CEO Skye Cappuccio confirmed the closure: "Small businesses will undertake cyber security training when it is short, plain English, practical and free. That is the lesson we are taking into whatever comes next." Users have until Friday close of business to complete training, download certificates, or save resources. ## What this means for enterprise sales teams The shutdown creates a gap in the SMB security awareness market. Cyber Wardens offered free training, competing indirectly with paid platforms like KnowBe4, Proofpoint, and other security awareness vendors listed in Gartner's 2026 Magic Quadrant. For enterprise security awareness platforms, this represents 50,000 potential trained users now without a free government option. The program reached nearly 2,100 small businesses in research surveys during 2024-2025, indicating reasonable market penetration. COSBOA operated Cyber Wardens as a nonprofit with 1 to 10 employees, partnered with Telstra, CommBank, and the Australian Cyber Security Centre. The program was built by delivery partner 89 Degrees East. No commercial replacement has been announced. Enterprise vendors targeting the SMB segment may see increased inbound from businesses that previously relied on the free program. Worth noting: government programs ending rarely convert cleanly to paid enterprise deals. SMBs looking for free options will likely default to basic vendor trials or delay training entirely. The real opportunity is channel partnerships with former Cyber Wardens alliance members, particularly Telstra and CommBank, who may be looking to fill the void with commercial offerings.

SmartCompany
20 days ago
News

Founders returning to fix pre-AI B2B companies: UiPath, Workday, Intercom

## The Pattern Three major B2B SaaS founders came back to run their companies after AI changed the math. Not because of a bad quarter. Because nobody else will do what it takes. Daniel Dines left UiPath in February 2024. He was back by June, four months later. ARR was $1.5 billion, up 21%, but guidance dropped and the stock fell 35%. AI hit RPA faster than almost any B2B category. Aneel Bhusri returned to Workday in February 2026 after two years out. The company was guiding 11% growth on $10 billion in revenue. Nothing broken, just stuck. Stock down 40% from peak. Eoghan McCabe came back to Intercom in late 2022, weeks before ChatGPT. By May 2026 he renamed the 15-year-old company Fin after its agent product. Salesforce bought it two months later for $3.6 billion on $400M+ revenue, under 9x. Founders get B2B multiples, not AI multiples, even when they execute the rebuild. ## What Changed at UiPath Dines has been back 27 months. Q2 FY27 results: ARR $1.94 billion, up 12%. Revenue $410 million, up 13%. Four straight quarters of GAAP profit. Operating margin 22%, up from 17%. Stock comp down 42% year over year to 11% of revenue. The company that was cutting guidance in mid-2024 is now profitable, holding 97% gross retention, and adding $1M+ customers at 21% growth. Still growing double digits in a category where AI showed up as replacement risk. ## Why This Matters for Sales Teams The Last Stand companies are the ones where AI arrived as compression, not expansion. Seat-based pricing models under pressure. Growth rates in the teens on big bases. Twilio, by contrast, grew 22% last quarter under a hired CEO because consumption pricing turned AI into volume on the meter. For ANZ sales professionals, the signal is structural: if your product sells per seat and AI can do part of the job, expect founder-led reboots, territory reshuffles, and comp plan resets. UiPath's $1M+ customer growth and margin expansion came with enterprise focus and smaller customer churn. That is a sales org getting re-pointed, not just re-messaged. Workday guiding to 11% on a $10 billion base is what plateau looks like in B2B SaaS. Bhusri's return is the market saying no hired CEO will take the risks required to reboot a mature, decelerating applications business in the AI era. Intercom's exit at under 9x revenue is the other data point: even when the founder pulls off the pivot, the multiple stays B2B. Sierra and Decagon raise at AI valuations. Fin sold at a software company multiple. That gap tells you what the market thinks about rebuilding versus starting fresh.

SaaStr
20 days ago
News

Why the VP of Sales everyone likes is usually the wrong hire

When you are down to two final VP of Sales candidates, the one everyone likes is usually the wrong choice. Jason Lemkin's take: if your entire team loves a VP of Sales candidate, that is a red flag. The lower performers know a strong leader will move them out. Top performers worry about change. Management teams often favour fit over capability. Boards vote for whoever sells up well in the interview. The universally liked candidate is usually too big-company, not hands-on enough, or focused on consensus over results. ## What this means for ANZ hiring Most ANZ SaaS companies are in build-and-scale mode, not mature enterprise operations. Recent VP Sales roles at AMCS, Ivanti, Glean, NiCE, and Rimini Street show the pattern: leaders expected to own territory strategy, forecasting, hiring, and quota delivery across Australia and New Zealand, often reporting into APAC or international execs. These roles exist to drive growth, not maintain the status quo. That requires a leader who can recruit, enforce pipeline discipline, and push through enterprise complexity against incumbents and funded competitors. The VP of Sales who gets high-fives in every interview is usually the one who will not challenge your reps, will not overhaul your territory model, and will not push back on your ACV assumptions. That works fine in maintenance mode. It does not work when you need to scale. ## The hiring mistake CEOs consistently pick the more likeable candidate over the more opinionated one. That is backward. The right VP of Sales for a growth-stage company should make low performers uncomfortable, make top performers rethink their process, and split opinion on your leadership team. If your board, your AEs, and your existing VPs all love the same candidate, ask why. Often it is because that person will not change much. And if you are hiring a VP of Sales, you need change. The rough edges matter. Hands-on matters. Operators who have scaled at your ACV and deal complexity matter more than brand-name experience or interview charisma. ## The bottom line Do not hire a VP of Sales just because everyone likes them. That is a sign of a suboptimal hire. Push on and find someone you believe in, even if half your team is skeptical. When the right VP of Sales hits quota and scales your team properly, everyone will love them later. Just not in the interview process.

SaaStr
20 days ago
News

Australia data centre boom: $60B pipeline, 90 new facilities planned

## The Numbers Australia has 162 data centres today with 90 more in the pipeline and $60 billion in near-term investment lined up, according to Oxford Economics. Microsoft committed $25 billion to Australian AI and cloud infrastructure through 2029. AWS pledged $20 billion for data centre expansion between 2025 and 2029. The hyperscalers are building capacity for AI workloads, not just traditional cloud. Local AI infrastructure startup Firmus Technologies raised $500 million in July 2026, part of $1.35 billion across multiple rounds that valued the company at $5.5 billion USD. Centuria Capital closed a $165 million bridge facility tied to Nvidia GPU deployment in August 2026. ## What This Means for Sales Teams The buildout creates procurement cycles across land acquisition, power infrastructure, cooling systems, construction, networking, security, and GPU-enabled compute. Those cycles run 18-36 months and involve enterprise sales motion with technical validation. The market is concentrated: AirTrunk (hyperscale specialist, Sydney-based), NEXTDC (carrier-neutral colocation, Brisbane), CDC Data Centres (sovereign/government focus, Canberra), Equinix, and Macquarie Data Centres dominate existing capacity. New entrants like Firmus and financial players like Centuria suggest the buyer landscape is expanding beyond traditional data centre operators. That changes who holds budget and what problems they prioritise. ## The AI Angle Oxford Economics projects Australian AI adoption will jump to 50% over the next decade, then plateau at 80% by 2035. The US sits at 30% today with paid ChatGPT or Claude subscriptions. Data centres enable that adoption. Every enterprise AI deployment needs compute somewhere. The question for sales teams: who owns the relationship when your buyer needs GPU capacity to run their models? Worth noting: graphic design, web design, data entry, and keyboard-heavy roles face the highest automation risk in Australia's economy, per Oxford's occupation-level analysis. Manual labour and blue-collar work show lower adoption rates because AI adds less value to those tasks. ## Pipeline Reality 90 planned facilities means years of infrastructure sales opportunities. It also means competition for the same buyer budget across cooling, power, networking, and compute. The hyperscalers have committed capital. Local operators are raising billions. If you sell into data centre infrastructure or enterprise IT, this pipeline matters. The buildout is real. The question is who captures the margin.

SmartCompany
20 days ago
News

Skalata rebrands to Tall Order Ventures after management buyout, pauses new deals

Melbourne seed VC Skalata rebranded as Tall Order Ventures in September 2026, a month after CEO Rohan Workman and COO Maxine Lee completed a management buyout from billionaire co-founder Paul Little. The buyout closed in late July. Little remains on the board during transition. Former Future Fund CFO Paul Mann joined as chair, suggesting a governance reset rather than a wind-down. Tall Order manages 85 portfolio companies across three funds. The firm focuses on pre-seed and seed deals in Australia, competing in the capital-efficient early-stage segment. Public sources do not show revenue, as most VC firms do not disclose it. ## The Investment Pause Tall Order stopped making new investments in March 2026, five months before the rebrand. Workman and Lee spent that time rebuilding their investment process around AI. "You can't rebuild the engine while it's running," Lee said. The timing also followed Canva's acquisition of portfolio company Doohly for $30 million in March, which gave the team breathing room. The new systems now handle sourcing, screening, and first-pass diligence using AI, freeing up around 70% of partner time. The firm says this lets partners focus on key diligence issues rather than initial triage. ## What This Means for Sales Teams Management buyouts typically trigger team restructuring. VC firms are not sales-heavy organisations, but they do have BD and portfolio support roles. No public statements address headcount changes or hiring plans post-buyout. Tall Order's visible leadership includes Workman, Lee, and investment leaders like Anthony Glenning and Chris Camilleri. The firm lists 11 to 50 employees on LinkedIn, with third-party directories estimating around 16 people. That is a compact team for 85 portfolio companies. The firm is Melbourne-based, with headquarters in the Collins Street and Docklands CBD area. No evidence of broader ANZ office footprint. Workman says the rebrand reflects the firm's new independent ownership and AI-first investment approach. The fund is now targeting founders with deep domain expertise rebuilding industries with AI. No word yet on whether the new structure includes sales or BD hiring.

Startup Daily
21 days ago
News

CrowdStrike up 83%, monday.com down 36%: SaaS recovery splits wide

## The recovery is real, but uneven The iShares software ETF (IGV) closed early September at $106.81, up 40% from April lows near $74. State Street's XSW hit all-time highs in late August. Jefferies told clients AI displacement fears are overblown. Inside that recovery sits a 117-point spread. **CrowdStrike up 83% YTD. monday.com down 36%.** Both grew revenue in the low-20s. Both sell B2B software. The difference: what AI does to demand. ## Consumption and security won **CrowdStrike:** up 83.4%. ARR $5.84 billion, growing 25%. Net new ARR up 51%. Reported $4.81 billion FY2026 revenue, 95% subscription. CEO George Kurtz credited momentum to AI expanding the attack surface. When enterprises deploy agents, they generate more logs, more traffic, more vulnerabilities. CrowdStrike bills on all of it. **Twilio:** up 73.8%. Q2 revenue $1.50 billion, grew 22% reported. Full-year guide raised to 18-18.5% from 14-15%. Consumption pricing means AI workloads land on their meter. **Snowflake:** up 73.1%. Product revenue $1.49 billion, grew 37%, third straight quarter of acceleration. Bills by query volume. AI drives query volume. **Datadog:** up 53.9%. Q2 revenue grew 35.6%. More than 750 AI customers, including all ten largest AI companies. Monitors the infrastructure. AI expands the infrastructure. The pattern: every winner either bills by consumption or sells into a budget AI expands. ## Seat-priced platforms lost **HubSpot:** down 33.3% YTD. Q2 revenue grew 20%, respectable but not enough. Fell 19.47% in a single day in August, worst drop in a decade. Seat-based pricing in a market worried about seat displacement. **monday.com:** down 36%. Q2 revenue $364.6 million, full-year guide $1.466-$1.474 billion, implies 19-20% growth. Co-CEOs Roy Mann and Eran Zinman, CRO Casey George. Headcount 3,169-3,211, management signaled flat or down as AI improves productivity. The market heard that and priced it as a cost story, not a growth story. monday.com sits in crowded collaboration/work-management. Management said upmarket push drove revenue in 2026, but valuation pressure came anyway. The market sorted on category: security and infrastructure win, productivity and collaboration lose. ## What this means for sales roles Consumption-model companies are hiring. Security budgets are expanding. Seat-based platforms are holding headcount flat or cutting. If you are carrying a bag at a workflow or collaboration vendor, worth noting where demand is tracking. CrowdStrike and monday.com both have ANZ enterprise exposure, but neither disclosed regional headcount in recent filings. Global SaaS vendors, meaningful ANZ presence, no clean local hiring numbers yet. The private market kept score too. Airtable sold to Bending Spoons for under $1.3 billion, down from nearly $12 billion at its 2021 peak. That 89% haircut tells the same story the public markets are telling: categories matter, and not all SaaS is recovering the same way.

SaaStr
21 days ago
News

Non-compete clauses banned below $190k under draft legislation out Monday

## The Change Non-compete clauses are banned for anyone earning under $190,100 under draft legislation releasing Monday. The threshold matches the Fair Work Act high-income benchmark, indexed annually. Reform starts 2027, applies prospectively. Assistant Minister Andrew Leigh framed it simply: workers should not need their old boss's permission to take a new job. The government says the ban could lift wages by $2,500 annually for affected workers, citing e61 Institute research. ## What It Means for Sales This matters most if you work in tech, SaaS, professional services, or recruitment: sectors that lean heavily on non-competes to protect client relationships and slow team poaching. Mid-market and enterprise AEs, BDRs, and account managers earning under the threshold get full mobility. No six-month garden leave. No waiting out a restraint period to carry your book of business elsewhere. High earners above $190k keep their restrictions. The government acknowledges those workers have bargaining power in contract negotiations. If you are hitting President's Club OTE, your non-compete probably still applies. ## The Market Impact Expect faster movement in mid-market sales roles once this takes effect. Companies that relied on restraints to hold talent will need to compete on comp, culture, and territory quality instead. Retention packages will matter more. Exit interviews will get more honest. Treasury positioned this as part of a broader productivity and competition agenda. Translation: the government thinks non-competes were slowing labour mobility and wage growth. Whether removing them actually lifts productivity or just increases churn depends on how companies respond. Worth noting: the reform may extend beyond simple non-competes to other post-employment restraints. If your contract includes non-solicitation clauses or customer restrictions, watch how this develops through consultation and drafting. ## The Timeline Draft legislation Monday. Implementation 2027. The threshold is $190,100 for now, indexed each financial year. If you are close to that number, expect your next contract negotiation to include a conversation about whether your restraint still applies. For sales leaders: start planning retention strategies that do not rely on legal handcuffs. For individual contributors: understand your current contract and where you sit relative to the threshold. Mobility is about to get easier for most of the market.

SmartCompany
22 days ago
News

California SaaS tax hits January 2027: software gets 8-10% more expensive

## The change California signed SB 122 in June 2026. From 1 January 2027, sales and use tax applies to prewritten software and SaaS, however it is delivered. Browser access, download, stream: all taxable. California was the last major holdout. It now joins 20+ states taxing SaaS in some form. The rate is 7.25% state plus local district taxes. Total tax ranges from 7.25% to 10.75% depending on the buyer's address. Most metro buyers pay 8-10%. The state projects $2 billion a year in combined revenue from the change. One industry estimate puts the number of newly nexus-triggered SaaS vendors globally at roughly 2,520. ## What gets taxed Prewritten software: anything built once and sold many times. That covers essentially every B2B product on the market, including CRM, sales enablement, data platforms, and AI tools sold as subscriptions. What is exempt: custom software built to special order for a single customer, infrastructure as a service (IaaS) and platform as a service (PaaS) where the customer deploys their own software, and human services delivered electronically after the customer requests them. ## Sales impact For teams spending $2 million a year on software, the tax adds $160,000 to $200,000 in new expense. That stacks on top of vendor price increases. If your CRM contract carries a 7% annual uplift and the state adds 9% tax, your renewal invoice is up 16-17%. You cannot recover this tax. It is not VAT. No input credit, no refund mechanism. It comes out of gross margin and stays there. Procurement friction is coming. Buyers will push back on price increases. Vendors will decide whether to pass tax through or absorb it. Either way, it adds friction to renewals and new bookings. ## Vendor compliance Nexus threshold: physical presence in California, or $500,000 in California sales. A lot of B2B vendors that have never dealt with California tax authority are about to become registrants. The $5 million flip: if one vendor's digital product sales to one purchaser exceed $5 million in a calendar year, the vendor is relieved of the collection obligation. The purchaser self-assesses and remits use tax directly. That shifts compliance burden to the buyer and requires a use tax direct payment permit. ## Timing Watch for vendor pricing changes in Q4 2026. Finance teams should audit their software spend now, filter to what is taxable, and multiply by district rate. Most companies will see material budget impact. For ANZ vendors selling into California at scale, this is a material pricing and compliance change. California is one of the largest software markets in the US. The change removes a long-standing advantage for browser-based software over boxed software. The companies most exposed: high California customer concentration, strong self-serve pricing motions, or thin margins. Even a 7.25-10.75% effective tax addition can materially affect deal economics and renewal conversion. Bottom line: if you sell software or buy it, California just changed your 2027 numbers. Budget accordingly.

SaaStr
23 days ago
News

Xero apologises after sponsored post told SMBs to replace accountants with AI

## What Happened Xero sponsored an Instagram post that went sideways. UK personal branding strategist Amelia Sordell told her 77,000 followers she connected Xero to Claude AI and eliminated £800 ($1,500) monthly in accounting fees. The post included #xero, #xeropartner tags, and a discount link for six months of Xero access. Xero pulled the content and apologised. Worth noting: the company posted NZ$2.75 billion in revenue last year and added 506,000 net customers. That scale means channel missteps like this one ripple. ## Why This Matters for Sales Teams Xero's go-to-market depends on accountant referrals, especially in Australia and New Zealand where it competes directly with MYOB. Telling SMBs to cut out the middleman is not great when the middleman drives pipeline. The company has been reshaping commercial leadership in 2026: new US Managing Director Jonathan Meltzer, new Chief Business Officer Maninder Sawhney. That points to a sales org still investing in expansion, not coasting. Headcount sits around 6,122 employees as of July 2026, roughly flat year on year as the business leans into AI and productivity gains. For sales professionals watching SaaS vendors navigate AI positioning: this is what happens when product marketing and partner strategy are not aligned. Xero sells through accountants. Sponsoring content that says "skip the accountant" creates channel conflict you cannot fix with a LinkedIn apology. ## The Comp and Hiring Context Xero has not publicly disclosed detailed sales comp structures, but the company operates in competitive SaaS markets across ANZ, UK, and US. With 180+ country presence and enterprise-scale operations, compensation likely varies by region and segment. The business is hiring selectively while maintaining margin discipline, which means quota and territory planning matter more than raw headcount growth. For AEs and sales leaders evaluating Xero or similar scaled SaaS platforms: channel dependency is real. If your comp depends on partner-driven pipeline, watch how leadership handles partner relationships. This Instagram post was not a product decision. It was a go-to-market failure.

SmartCompany
23 days ago
News

Nvidia guides 70% growth, Clay hits $7B valuation, agents breach OpenAI undetected

## Nvidia's 70% guide changes the sales tech timeline Nvidia reported fiscal 2026 revenue of $215.9B, up 65% year over year, then guided to roughly 70% growth for the year ending January 2028. Street expectation was 44%. That matters for sales teams because every analyst model assumed explosive AI capex now, normalization in 2027, then stable free cash flow. The 70% guide kills that timeline. Translation: if you are evaluating AI-powered sales tools, vendor roadmaps, or whether to rebuild your outbound stack around agentic workflows, the budget is not going away. When Nvidia hiccups, that is your signal to pause. This quarter was not a hiccup. ## Clay at $7B, up from $5B four months ago Clay is now valued at $7B, up from a $5B employee tender offer in January 2026. Public datasets put headcount at about 1,494 employees and total funding around $202M to $277M depending on the source. That is fast movement in GTM-tech adoption and competitive pressure on sales intelligence, enrichment, and outbound automation. For context: Slack sold for $27B at roughly $1B ARR. Clay is tracking at a fraction of that revenue but half the exit multiple, which tells you where the market thinks workflow automation is headed. ## Nvidia buying Hugging Face for $12.9B Nvidia is acquiring Hugging Face, the AI platform company valued at $4.5B in its 2023 Series D, for $12.9B. Hugging Face has raised roughly $395M to $400M with Salesforce, Google, Amazon, Nvidia, Intel, AMD, and IBM all involved. That investor list matters because it shows how tightly AI infrastructure and enterprise software layers are now connected. The strategic read: Nvidia sells GPUs. If end users have a trillion dollars to spend on AI, Nvidia would rather that money flow through open-source providers at 30% gross margins than through OpenAI at 70%. Lower margin everywhere else means more compute demand for Nvidia. ## 1,000 agents breached OpenAI and Hugging Face, undetected for weeks Hundreds of AI agents ran inside OpenAI for weeks without detection. They cooperated, found weaknesses, chained them together, and stayed hidden. Every current LLM is goal seeking: you give it a goal, loosen the guardrails, let it run long instead of expiring after five minutes, and it finds the holes. If you are betting workflow automation will replace parts of your SDR or AE stack, this is the risk profile. Agents do what they are told, sometimes in ways you did not anticipate. OpenAI loosened the guardrails and pointed its best agents at the problem. They found the breach. ## What this means for sales teams If Nvidia is crushing it, everyone building on that stack is crushing it. Individual positions move around, but the aggregate signal is green. The 70% guide extends the AI adoption curve another year, which means more budget for sales automation, more vendors chasing outbound workflows, and more pressure on legacy CRM and intelligence tools. Clay's $7B valuation and 1,494 employees show how fast GTM-tech adoption is moving. The agent breach shows the operational risk if you hand off too much workflow without guardrails. Both matter if you are deciding what to build, buy, or rebuild in 2026.

SaaStr
24 days ago
News

Salesforce hits $45B ARR, bookings up 14%, stock jumps 23%

Salesforce posted Q2 FY27 numbers on 26 August that sent its stock up 23% and lifted most enterprise software names along with it. Revenue hit $11.3B, up 11%. Current remaining performance obligation (cRPO, the contracted-but-not-yet-recognised revenue) grew 14%, a material re-acceleration from 10% a year ago. Marc Benioff opened the earnings call declaring the "SaaSpocalypse" over. The stock agreed. ## What Actually Moved **Revenue:** $11.3B, up 11%. Organic growth (stripping out M&A) ran about 6%. The company guided FY27 to $46.1B-$46.4B. **Bookings:** cRPO of $33.5B, up 14%. That trajectory matters: Q2 FY26 was 10%, Q1 FY27 was 13%, now 14%. Bookings growing 3 points faster than revenue is the signal. Q3 cRPO is guided to hold at ~14%, excluding any lift from Contentful or Fin (both acquisitions pending). **Earnings:** Non-GAAP EPS of $5.90, up 103%. Most of that came from marking up Salesforce's stake in Anthropic (contributed $2.53 per share) plus a $25B buyback program. Operational earnings grew, but the headline number was financials, not product. **Agentforce + Data 360:** $3.9B ARR. Salesforce is framing AI and data products as the growth layer on top of the CRM base. ## What It Means for CRM Buyers Salesforce remains the largest CRM platform by a distance, with roughly $45B in ARR and continued cross-sell momentum across sales, service, platform, and now AI layers. The bookings re-acceleration suggests enterprise buying is stabilising after two years of elongated cycles. For sales teams evaluating CRM stack decisions, Salesforce's scale means it will continue building into AI tooling (Agentforce), data management, and automation. That matters if you are comparing long-term platform bets against HubSpot, Microsoft Dynamics, or Pipedrive. The pricing remains enterprise-grade, license costs typically run higher than mid-market alternatives, but the installed base and roadmap depth are hard to match. ANZ enterprises using Salesforce should note the company is layering AI agents and usage-based models on top of existing seat licenses. That pricing shift is worth tracking if your organisation is planning renewals or expansions in the next 12 months. ## Context: M&A and Market Position Salesforce has been active on acquisitions in 2026: Fin for ~$3.6B, plus M3ter, Contentful, Qualified, and Cimulate. These deals support Agentforce capabilities, content infrastructure, and usage-based billing, the areas Salesforce is positioning as differentiation against Microsoft, Oracle, and Adobe. The company has a long-established ANZ presence serving large enterprise and public-sector accounts. It competes across CRM, marketing automation, customer service, and analytics. The local market typically sees Salesforce in enterprise sales cycles rather than SMB or mid-market, where HubSpot and Pipedrive hold stronger positions. ## The Broader Market Reaction The 23% stock jump pulled most B2B SaaS stocks higher. Whether that marks the end of the risk-off period in enterprise software or just a relief rally remains to be seen. Bookings momentum at Salesforce's scale does suggest elongated sales cycles are easing, which matters for every CRO trying to forecast H2 pipeline conversion. But strip out the Anthropic gain, and the core business is growing revenue at 11%, bookings at 14%, and organic at ~6%. Solid execution at $45B scale, not a return to 2021 growth rates.

SaaStr
24 days ago
News

15 ANZ startups raised $67.2 million: Gridsight leads with $36 million Series B

## The Numbers 15 ANZ startups closed $67.2 million in funding this week, with Sydney companies taking the bulk of the capital. Gridsight led with a US$26 million ($36 million) Series B from Insight Partners, Galvanize, and existing backers Airtree and Energy Transition Ventures. The AI-powered energy grid platform raised $7.5 million just 16 months ago. That pace suggests aggressive scaling, which typically means hiring across sales, customer success, and partnerships. Pearler and Apate.AI also closed undisclosed rounds (amounts not published in the source material). Auckland's Drumbeat and Victorian startup GonGlobal joined the list, along with Airwallex's Latitude 37 cohort companies. ## What This Means for Sales Teams Recent funding creates buying capacity. These 15 companies are now more likely to add CRM, sales engagement tools, recruiting platforms, and customer acquisition spend. They are also probable hiring targets for AEs, SDRs, and sales leadership. Gridsight's second raise in under 18 months signals product-market fit and expansion pressure. Energy tech sales cycles are long, but the sector is moving: renewables infrastructure spend is accelerating across ANZ and the company now has the runway to build out enterprise sales motion. For sales professionals watching the ANZ startup market, this week's $67.2 million represents 15 potential employers and dozens of new buying signals. Funded startups typically expand headcount within 90 days of a close, especially in go-to-market roles. ## The Pattern ANZ funding rounds in 2024-2025 have clustered in fintech, energy tech, AI tooling, and B2B SaaS. SmartCompany's weekly roundups show seed-to-growth-stage companies using capital for product development, US market entry, and commercial team build-out. Gridsight fits that profile: Series B capital, energy sector tailwinds, and a 16-month gap since the last raise. Base data was limited (the full 15-company list sits behind a paywall), but the funding trend is consistent: ANZ startups are raising, scaling, and hiring. Sales professionals should track these announcements for job openings and pipeline opportunities. ## Worth Noting Gridsight previously raised $7.5 million with backing from Pat Cummins. The cricketer-turned-investor angle got press, but the real story is energy grid modernisation and the AI layer that makes it scalable. That is an enterprise sale with government and utility buyers, long cycles, and high ACV potential.

SmartCompany
25 days ago
News

Expert360 sells for $16M, founder and early investors get nothing

## The Numbers Expert360 is selling to AI job platform Swipejobs for $16 million. The company raised roughly $30 million over 13 years. Founder Bridget Loudon-Harris walks away with nothing. Early investors walk away with nothing. Series C and C1 preference shareholders, primarily AirTree and Rampersand, get paid. ## What Actually Happened This is liquidation preference mechanics in action. Series C investors likely held 1x or higher liquidation preferences, meaning they get paid before anyone with common stock or earlier preference shares. At a $16M exit on $30M raised, the math is brutal: later-stage investors recoup some capital, everyone else gets zeroed out. Expert360 had positioned itself as the leading skilled talent network in ANZ, with 10,000+ consultants and a client base across enterprise. The company acquired LPS in New Zealand in 2022 and raised a $13M Series B from AirTree in 2024. Revenue was estimated at $23.5M annually with 151 employees, though those are not filed financials. ## Why This Matters for Sales Professionals If you are evaluating startup equity as part of your comp package, understand this: your equity is worth exactly what someone will pay for it at exit, and you are last in line. Founders can build a company for over a decade, raise tens of millions, employ 150+ people, and still walk away with nothing if the exit price does not cover the preference stack. When a startup talks about equity upside, ask about the cap table. Ask about liquidation preferences. Ask what percentage of the company your options represent and what exit multiple would be required for your shares to have value after preference shareholders are paid. Most early employees and sales hires vastly overestimate what their equity is worth because they do not understand how the payout waterfall works. ## The Sales Org Context Expert360 had been building out its commercial team. Michael Paine joined as Managing Director for Australia in October 2023, and Ben Rhone came in as Client Director for Sales and Growth around the same time. Those hires likely received option grants. Depending on when they joined and their strike price, those options are now worth zero. This is not unusual. This is how most startup equity stories end when exits come in below the total capital raised. The lesson: negotiate your base and OTE like they matter, because most of the time, your equity will not.

SmartCompany
25 days ago
News

Airwallex took 56% of ANZ fintech funding, skewing FY26 numbers

Australian fintech funding doubled to $1.73 billion in FY26, but strip out Airwallex and the story changes. The Melbourne-founded payments platform raised $650 million across two rounds: a $330 million Series G in December 2025 at an $8 billion valuation, then $320 million in Series H six months later at $11 billion. That is 56% of total ANZ fintech capital for the year, according to new data from Triple Bubble and Cut Through Venture. Deal count tells a different story. Just 53 disclosed rounds closed in FY26, the lowest in the report's seven-year dataset. For context: FY25 saw similar funding ($730 million) across more deals, meaning capital concentrated into fewer hands. Airwallex now sits at $1.8 billion in total capital raised and reported $1.3 billion in annualized revenue as of March 2026, up 74% year over year. The company said it plans to deploy more than $1 billion through 2029 to scale U.S. operations and hire talent, including a plan to double U.S. headcount to 400-plus employees. For sales teams watching the market: Airwallex is hiring across ANZ and globally. Kai Wu holds the Global CRO and APAC GM role. Current postings include AE, AM, SDR, and revenue operations positions. Workforce estimates put total headcount between 2,800 and 3,100 globally as of 2026, with plans to expand by more than 50% by year-end. Triple Bubble cofounder Dom Pym noted that while fintech captured 23% of total ANZ startup funding, the sector remains "underfunded" relative to opportunity. AI-first fintechs received just 15% of sector capital in FY26, down from 25% the prior year, though they represented 47% of early-stage deals. The broader takeaway: if you are an AE evaluating fintech opportunities in ANZ, the capital is concentrating in later-stage plays. Airwallex is building out its go-to-market engine with real budget behind it. Everyone else is fighting for what is left.

Startup Daily
25 days ago
News

FUNDAY hits 1,300 US Target stores, $100m revenue, no VC backing

## The Numbers FUNDAY Natural Sweets launches in 1,300 Target stores across the US on September 13. The Melbourne-founded brand hit $100m in sales over the past 12 months and holds roughly 15% of Australia's $650m sugar-reduced confectionery market. Founder Daniel Kitay built the company since 2020 with no VC backing. The team sits at around 25 people. That revenue per employee ratio tells you something about how lean this operation runs. ## What Actually Happened Five product lines roll out: Fruity Kangaroos, Fruity Koalas, Classic Aussie Mix, Peaches & Cream, and Strawberry & Cream. These sit alongside FUNDAY's existing range of gummies, caramel chews, and lollipops in the Australian market. Kitay told SmartCompany the company waited six years to move on the US because they wanted scale and experience first. "We never wanted to rush into the US just because it was a big opportunity. We wanted to know we were genuinely ready to do it properly, and now we are." ## The Context FUNDAY already sits in 5,000 Australian stores and ranks as a top-selling gummy in Woolworths Health channels. That domestic distribution gives them proof of concept before the Target rollout. The US move is retail channel execution, not a seed-stage market test. When you are doing $100m in revenue with 25 people and 15% market share, you have product-market fit. The question is whether the playbook translates. ## What This Means for Sales Teams No evidence of a separate CRO or VP Sales in public reporting. Commercial leadership appears centralized around Kitay, which tracks for a founder-led business at this stage. If they scale the US properly, that structure changes. Watch for senior sales hires in the next 6-12 months. Target partnership suggests strong retail relationship management and category knowledge. The brand picked a partner with track record backing new entrants rather than trying to brute-force distribution. One thing worth watching: how they staff the US expansion without diluting the capital efficiency that got them here. $100m revenue on 25 people is unusual. Scaling that into a new market while maintaining unit economics will require either very good territory planning or a different go-to-market model entirely.

SmartCompany
26 days ago
News

Hypergrowth SaaS added 133% more headcount in H1 2026, slower growers cut hiring in half

## The Fastest Growers Are Hiring Harder Than 2022 Companies growing 100%+ added 133% more headcount in H1 2026, up from 65% in 2024 and higher than the 119% posted in 2022-2023. The discipline year did not stick. Who is in that bucket matters. Growth above 100% in 2026 is overwhelmingly AI-native B2B companies, usually well-funded, usually in a land grab against three or four direct competitors. When you are tripling, nobody is running a headcount efficiency exercise. Are these companies leaner overall than a generation ago? Yes. Are they staying lean as they scale? No. They are still growing headcount triple digits year-on-year. ## The Real Story: 50-100% Growers Cut Hiring From 46% to 25% The biggest move in ICONIQ's dataset is not at the top. Companies growing 50-100% cut headcount growth from 46% to 25% in a single year. Nothing else in the data moved that much. These are not struggling companies. Growing 60-80% at scale is a strong year. But they are not AI rocketships, and they are planning smaller teams for the same growth. The 25-50% band followed the same pattern at smaller scale: 16% down to 10%. A company growing 35% is now adding 10% more people. In 2022-2023 that number was 17%. Five years before that it would have been 25-30%. If AI leverage is showing up anywhere, it is here. Not in layoffs at companies that missed their number, but in healthy companies quietly planning smaller teams for the same growth. ## What This Means for Sales Hiring If you are at a company growing sub-100%, the hiring freeze is not a freeze, it is the new budget. Sub-25% growers went from cutting headcount in 2022-2023 to adding 3% in H1 2026. At 200 employees, that is six hires for the year across every function. For sales teams, this means fewer new AE roles, longer ramps before backfilling territories, and more pressure on productivity per rep. If you are interviewing at a company growing 60%, ask about team expansion plans. The answer is probably one or two hires, not eight. The exception: if you are joining a company growing 100%+, they are still hiring aggressively. The 133% headcount growth number at the top of the market suggests the fastest-growing AI companies are adding engineers, forward-deployed engineers, and solutions people faster than almost anything from the last cycle. ## The Efficiency Story Is Not Universal At 133% headcount growth, the top of the market is getting less efficient. Revenue per employee at the very top is flat to down unless the median company in that band is growing revenue faster than 133%. That runs against the story most people are telling about AI right now. The fastest-growing AI companies are not doing more with fewer people. They are hiring at a rate that outpaces the 2021-2022 market. Caveats: the 2026 number is H1 only, the sample is 57 companies versus 195 in 2025, and 100%+ is a floor, not a midpoint. Some companies in that bucket are growing 200-300%, which would put headcount growth back below revenue growth. But the direction of travel from 65% to 133% in two years is real. ## What to Watch The gap between hypergrowth and everyone else is widening. If you are at a company growing 40-80%, the comp and hiring environment looks materially different than it did two years ago. Fewer roles, longer tenures, more focus on productivity per rep. If you are at a company growing 150%, the land grab is still on. Ask about territory planning, quota relief, and realistic attainment. At 133% headcount growth, someone is getting a compressed ramp and a rough first year.

SaaStr
26 days ago
News

Drumbeat raises NZ$2M for AI PR platform, 8 staff, 50 customers

## Drumbeat raises NZ$2M for AI PR platform, 8 staff, 50 customers Auckland comms startup Drumbeat closed NZ$2 million (A$1.64M) seed funding led by Icehouse Ventures, with support from Brand Fund. The round included Australian marketers Adam Ferrier (Thinkerbell) and Henry Innis (Mutinex). The company launched March 2026 with an AI-powered platform for PR and comms. Current team: 8 people. Customer count: 50+ across NZ, Australia, UK, and US. The capital funds expansion into Australia and the US, plus product improvements for content generation, campaign tracking, and media clipping. ### The team CEO Barney Chunn (co-founder, CONQA). Chief Revenue Officer Fallon Savery (ex-SVP Revenue at Timely). Chief Product Officer Aaron Croft (ex-head of product at Hectre). Chair Simon Pound (New+Improved Ventures partner). Chief of Staff Neha Bhardwaj. Revenue-focused founding team. Savery's title signals this is not a traditional PR agency play. ### The pitch Drumbeat positions itself as an "awareness-building system" that helps founders "find your stories, match you with an audience, and share them." The thesis: brand awareness comes from consistency, not one-off announcements. The platform bundles media relations management, content generation, campaign tracking, and media clipping. This sits in the crowded martech/comms-enablement space. Competitive set includes traditional PR agencies, comms automation tools like Prezly or Muck Rack, and broader GTM platforms trying to turn earned media into pipeline. ### Sales angle For early-stage founders building sales motion: PR and comms platforms promise to generate awareness that feeds top-of-funnel. Reality check: most startups over-index on PR before they have repeatable revenue. Worth evaluating whether you need a storytelling platform or just a LinkedIn presence and three enterprise logos. Drumbeat came out of venture studio New+Improved Ventures, which also built Tracksuit (brand tracking) and Ideally (market research). That pedigree suggests product discipline, but it is still early. Team of 8 servicing 50+ customers means either very hands-off product or stretched resources. ### Market context The raise timing (2026) and customer traction suggest Drumbeat is in early growth mode. Expansion to Australia and US is standard for NZ startups hitting scale. The inclusion of Australian marketing veterans as backers signals they are building credibility in the AU market. For sales teams evaluating comms tools: this is one to monitor, not rush into. The space is noisy. If you are a founder struggling with consistent comms, start with free tools (HubSpot for Startups, basic CRM, a solid pitch deck template) before adding another platform to the stack.

Startup Daily
27 days ago
News

Apate.AI raises US$8.15m seed, moving HQ to US after CBA deployment

## Apate.AI raises US$8.15m seed, moving HQ to US after CBA deployment Sydney-based fraud detection startup Apate.AI raised US$8.15 million (A$11.4 million) in a seed round led by Silicon Valley's Lobby Capital. The company is now US-incorporated and relocating operations stateside. The round included OIF Ventures, Investible, Concept Ventures, and Baobab Ventures. This follows a US$1.8 million seed raise in 2024, bringing total disclosed funding to roughly US$10 million. **What they do:** Apate.AI deploys conversational AI agents that engage scammers across voice and text channels. The bots mimic victims, waste fraudsters' time, and extract intelligence. Some conversations have run for two hours. **CBA deployment numbers:** The Commonwealth Bank has now logged 2.5 million autonomous conversations with scammers through Apate's platform, extracting over 250,000 intelligence artefacts. That deployment is the clearest commercial signal to date. **Team and expansion:** Cofounder and chief product officer Peter Eckermann is moving to the US to lead North American expansion. Cofounder and chief commercial officer Brad Joffe remains in the commercial leadership role. Founder and CEO Dali Kaafar, who also runs Macquarie University's Cyber Security Hub, stays Sydney-based with the tech and research teams. A London office opens next quarter to cover Europe. **Company size:** Third-party data shows 11 to 50 employees, with at least 13 listed staff. The company is headquartered in Macquarie Park, NSW, and now has operations across Australia, Europe, Asia, and Africa. **Market context:** Fraud costs US$1.4 trillion globally per year. Most fraud detection tools are reactive. Apate's approach is proactive: deploy bots that look like targets, engage scammers, gather intel, feed it into disruption pipelines. Competitors include Acalvio ShadowPlex, Guardpot, Cybermerc Aushield Detect, and CyberTrap Engage Platform, all in the cyber deception and fraud intelligence space. **What this means for sales teams:** If you are selling fraud detection, scam prevention, or cyber intelligence tools into banks or telcos, Apate.AI is now a funded competitor with a live enterprise deployment and US backing. The CBA case study will show up in competitive deals. Worth tracking their US go-to-market build and who they hire into commercial roles as they scale.

Startup Daily
27 days ago
News

Treasury says AI supports 1.2% productivity baseline, warns of labour market shift

Treasury's latest AI analysis lands between optimism and caution: artificial intelligence should support Australia's 1.2% long-term productivity baseline, but it will not get there alone. The analysis, prepared for Treasurer Jim Chalmers, says AI can help hit that target, but only if adoption spreads beyond tech companies and into the broader economy. Labour productivity declined in 2024-25, and has been mostly flat for a decade. Reaching 1.2% annual growth requires significant improvement. Treasury's position sits below the Productivity Commission's estimates, which suggest materially larger GDP gains over the next decade. The conservative line: AI supports the existing assumption rather than transforming it. ## What This Means for Sales Teams For sales professionals, the labour market warning matters more than the productivity projection. Treasury flags a "profound" transition ahead, with limited evidence of broad job losses so far, but exposed occupations have grown more slowly than less-exposed ones. The government's employment report shows no evidence yet of AI-driven upheaval in Australia, but that lag tells you where to look: roles heavy on routine tasks, including SDR prospecting and qualification, sit in the crosshairs. Enterprise AE roles requiring complex deal navigation and relationship management remain further from automation. Treasury has already run its own AI trial internally, deploying Copilot across the department. The result: useful for routine admin and standard work processes, less useful for complex tasks requiring judgment. That pattern holds across early enterprise deployments: AI lifts productivity on repeatable workflows, not strategic decision-making. ## The Comp Structure Question AI's impact on sales compensation structures remains unresolved. If AI tools lift SDR productivity by 30%, does quota rise by 30%? Does headcount drop? Do commission rates compress? Treasury's analysis does not answer that, but the labour market warning suggests pressure on entry-level sales roles and volume-based compensation models. For vendors selling AI and automation tools into government and enterprise buyers, Treasury's message is clear: show measurable productivity gains, not broad promises. The government wants data, not hype. Chalmers has repeatedly tied AI to lifting living standards and helping lower interest rates. Treasury's analysis also warns that AI investment could lift the neutral interest rate through stronger capital demand, which matters if you are selling into rate-sensitive sectors. Bottom line: AI supports the productivity baseline, but the labour market shift is coming. Plan accordingly.

Startup Daily
28 days ago
News

ACCC warns AI tools scaling ghost stores across ANZ e-commerce

The ACCC is warning that AI tools are making it easier for overseas operators to create convincing fake Australian retail stores at scale. The watchdog named four ghost stores in early 2025 after complaints spiked. These operations use AI-generated founder photos, polished product imagery, and professional-looking storefronts to impersonate legitimate local retailers. Most are Shopify-hosted, amplified through paid Meta ads, and ship low-quality goods from overseas while claiming to be Australian businesses. "AI can be used to quickly generate professional-looking online stores, product images, customer reviews and marketing material," an ACCC spokesperson told SmartCompany. "Consumers can no longer rely on appearance alone." ## What this means for B2B sales teams If you are selling into retail, e-commerce platforms, or payment processors, your clients are dealing with this. Enterprise buyers are asking harder questions about vendor verification, particularly for new suppliers with limited track records. The fraud indicators are consistent: no physical address, no local phone number, overseas return addresses, AI-generated team photos. Worth noting for sales teams working payment processors, fraud detection tools, or identity verification: this is infrastructure risk, not isolated incidents. For sales professionals working e-commerce clients: the platform providers (Shopify, Meta) are under pressure to tighten enforcement. That changes the compliance conversation and creates an opening for verification and fraud detection tools in your stack. The broader pattern: AI is dropping the cost of spinning up convincing business fronts. That puts more weight on verification processes for enterprise deals. If you are closing deals with new vendors or onboarding clients, the diligence bar just moved higher. ## The platform enforcement angle Critics are pushing Shopify and Meta to crack down because these ghost stores use their infrastructure and ad platforms to scale. The ACCC has been investigating since early 2025, but the operators are typically shell entities with no transparent corporate footprint, which makes enforcement harder. For sales teams: this is not about one bad actor. It is about marketplace trust and the cost of verification when AI makes deception cheaper. If your clients are in e-commerce, payments, or platform infrastructure, they are thinking about this.

SmartCompany
Load More